Tag Archives: INASP

Why INASP’s core pillars matter
avatar

INASP Core pillars

As we celebrate our 25th anniversary, we’ve been reflecting on INASP’s core pillars – the approaches that are most important in our work to put research and knowledge at the heart of development. INASP’s core pillars are central to our identity as a catalyst for change.

How do they play out in practice? And what makes these approaches unique? Our staff reflect. Continue reading

Posted in Blog, General | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

‘Reading organizations’: a new diagnostic tool to improve knowledge to policy systems
avatar

Clara Richards, Senior Programme Manager, Evidence-Informed Policy Making Team, INASP introduces a series of posts on new approaches for organizational change Over the four years in which INASP and Politics & Ideas have been improving knowledge to policy systems, we have heard a great deal about the complex context within which public agencies operate. Recognizing the need for new approaches to address this complexity, we developed the ‘Context Matters’ framework. The framework summarizes key organizational factors influencing how government agencies use –  or don’t use – knowledge. This year, we are ready to apply it as a new diagnostic tool to improve the use of knowledge in policy within a government agency. We will use the tool to: diagnose the current state of knowledge production and use in a government agency identify areas that have potential to catalyse change co-produce a feasible change plan that reflects the agency’s realities and … Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , Comments Off on ‘Reading organizations’: a new diagnostic tool to improve knowledge to policy systems

Turning the gender lens inwards: INASP’s Gender Audit
avatar

Blog post by Ruth Bottomley, Senior Programme Manager, Research Development and Support, INASP

Over the last few years there has been growing recognition within INASP that a commitment to incorporating gender considerations in our work is critical to meeting our mission to support individuals and institutions to produce, share and use research and knowledge, which can transform lives. This commitment to gender equity is clearly outlined in the INASP Strategy, but putting the commitment into practice can be challenging.
Continue reading

Posted in Gender, General | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Turning the gender lens inwards: INASP’s Gender Audit

The EIPM Toolkit: An open resource for practitioners and civil servants in developing countries
avatar

Emily Hayter from the INASP EIPM team explains how the VakaYiko Evidence-Informed Policy Making Toolkit can be used as a resource material by civil servants, researchers and trainers independently, and without any prior training. Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , Comments Off on The EIPM Toolkit: An open resource for practitioners and civil servants in developing countries

Knowledge into policy: Going beyond “Context matters”
avatar

In an article first published in the Politics and Ideas blog, Vanesa Weyrauch shares her experience of writing a new study Going beyond “Context matters”, that aims to promote the use of knowledge into policy. This framework is written in collaboration with INASP. Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , 3 Comments

Tackling systems and complexity in a research capacity programme: Part 3
avatar

This is a joint post written by: Alex Ademokun (@AAlex_A), Senior Programme Manager, Evidence-Informed Policy Making Jonathan Harle (@jonharle), Senior Programme Manager, Research Access and Availability In our last two posts, we discussed how INASP’s thinking on capacity building has been influenced by some recent debates on systems and complexity (and also by many years of experience) and how we go about understanding the national research systems in which we work. In the intervening weeks we’ve had some really valuable comments, and had the opportunity to reflect further as our programmes continue to unfold. As we’ve said before, we see ourselves as a ‘doing’ organisation, and want to try and ground this discussion in specific, practical experience as far as we can. So here we want to offer some examples of these approaches in three of the countries we’re working in – Nepal, Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe.

Posted in General, Series | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Tackling systems and complexity in a research capacity programme: Part 3